Close Menu
    Trending
    • AMD CEO Claims New AI Chips ‘Outperform’ Nvidia’s
    • How AI Agents “Talk” to Each Other
    • Creating Smart Forms with Auto-Complete and Validation using AI | by Seungchul Jeff Ha | Jun, 2025
    • Why Knowing Your Customer Drives Smarter Growth (and Higher Profits)
    • Stop Building AI Platforms | Towards Data Science
    • What If Your Portfolio Could Speak for You? | by Lusha Wang | Jun, 2025
    • High Paying, Six Figure Jobs For Recent Graduates: Report
    • What If I had AI in 2018: Rent the Runway Fulfillment Center Optimization
    Finance StarGate
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • AI Technology
    • Data Science
    • Machine Learning
    • Finance
    • Passive Income
    Finance StarGate
    Home»Machine Learning»Optimizing Linear Programming: CVXOPT vs. Geometric Approach — A Hands-on Guide | by Trumphan | Feb, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Optimizing Linear Programming: CVXOPT vs. Geometric Approach — A Hands-on Guide | by Trumphan | Feb, 2025

    FinanceStarGateBy FinanceStarGateFebruary 25, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Whereas CVXOPT offers a strong mathematical strategy to fixing Linear Programming (LP) issues, the graphical technique presents a visible illustration of the possible area and optimum resolution. This strategy is especially helpful for two-variable LP issues, permitting us to see how constraints work together and the place the optimum resolution lies.

    The graphical technique solves an LP drawback by plotting its constraints and figuring out the possible area, which represents all doable options that fulfill the constraints. The optimum resolution is discovered at a vertex (nook level) of this possible area.

    💡 When to Use the Graphical Methodology?
    ✅ Works finest for two-variable LP issues (straightforward to visualise in 2D).
    ✅ Helps perceive constraint interactions and feasibility.
    ✅ Helpful for educating and verifying options from algebraic solvers.

    ⚠️ Limitations:
    ❌ Not scalable past two variables (3D visualization is troublesome, and better dimensions can’t be plotted).
    ❌ Much less environment friendly for large-scale issues in comparison with mathematical solvers like CVXOPT.

    1. Importing Required Libraries
    from sympy import symbols, Eq, remedy, N  # For fixing linear equations
    import numpy as np # For numerical operations
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # For visualization
    from scipy.optimize import linprog # To compute the optimum resolution
    from scipy.spatial import ConvexHull # For locating the possible area
    import warnings
    warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") # Suppress warnings

    2. Outline the Variables

    x, y = symbols('x y')
    • This defines x and y as the 2 determination variables.

    3. Get Person Enter for the Goal Perform and Constraints

    # Perform to get consumer enter for the target perform
    def get_objective_function():
    obj_x = float(enter("Enter the coefficient for x within the goal perform: "))
    obj_y = float(enter("Enter the coefficient for y within the goal perform: "))
    return obj_x, obj_y

    # Perform to get consumer enter for constraints
    def get_constraints():
    constraints = []
    num_constraints = int(enter("Enter the variety of constraints: "))
    for _ in vary(num_constraints):
    coeff_x = float(enter("Enter the coefficient for x within the constraint: "))
    coeff_y = float(enter("Enter the coefficient for y within the constraint: "))
    signal = enter("Enter the inequality signal (=): ")
    rhs = float(enter("Enter the right-hand aspect worth: "))
    if signal == " constraints.append((coeff_x, coeff_y, rhs, " elif signal == ">=":
    constraints.append((coeff_x, coeff_y, rhs, ">="))
    return constraints

    # Get consumer enter for the target perform and constraints
    obj_x, obj_y = get_objective_function()
    constraints = get_constraints()

    4. Clear up for Intersection Factors

    corner_points = []
    for i in vary(len(constraints)):
    for j in vary(i + 1, len(constraints)):
    coeffs1 = constraints[i]
    coeffs2 = constraints[j]
    expr1 = Eq(coeffs1[0] * x + coeffs1[1] * y, coeffs1[2])
    expr2 = Eq(coeffs2[0] * x + coeffs2[1] * y, coeffs2[2])
    resolution = remedy((expr1, expr2), (x, y))
    if resolution:
    corner_points.append((N(resolution[x]), N(resolution[y])))
    • This solves the system of equations for every pair of constraints to search out intersection factors.
    • (x, y) values at these intersections are potential nook factors of the possible area.

    5. Filter Out Infeasible Factors

    # Filter out factors that do not fulfill all constraints
    feasible_points = []
    for level in corner_points:
    if all(
    (coeffs[0] * level[0] + coeffs[1] * level[1] = coeffs[2])
    for coeffs in constraints
    ):
    feasible_points.append(level)
    • This filters out factors that don’t fulfill all constraints.

    6. Plot the Constraint Strains

    # Outline the target perform
    def objective_function(x_val, y_val):
    return obj_x * x_val + obj_y * y_val

    # Generate x and y values for plotting
    x_vals = np.linspace(-20, 20, 1000)
    y_vals = np.linspace(-20, 20, 1000)
    X, Y = np.meshgrid(x_vals, y_vals)

    # Plot the possible area and constraints
    plt.determine()
    colours = ['b', 'g', 'r', 'c', 'm', 'y', 'cyan', 'pink', 'darkviolet', 'lime', 'peru']
    for idx, coeffs in enumerate(constraints):
    coeff_x, coeff_y, rhs, signal = coeffs
    if coeff_y != 0:
    y_line = (rhs - coeff_x * x_vals) / coeff_y
    else:
    y_line = np.full_like(x_vals, rhs / coeff_x)
    plt.plot(x_vals, y_line, label=f'Constraint {idx + 1}', colour=colours[idx % len(colors)])

    # Plot x = 0 and y = 0 traces
    plt.axvline(x=0, colour='black', label='x = 0')
    plt.axhline(y=0, colour='black', label='y = 0')

    • Every constraint is plotted as a straight line.
    • Completely different colours assist differentiate constraints.

    7. Fill the Possible Area

    # Fill the possible area
    if feasible_points:
    feasible_points = np.array(feasible_points, dtype=float)
    if len(feasible_points) >= 3:
    hull = feasible_points[ConvexHull(feasible_points).vertices]
    plt.fill(hull[:, 0], hull[:, 1], 'gray', alpha=0.5)
    else:
    print('Not sufficient possible factors to assemble the convex hull')

    8. Compute the Optimum Answer Utilizing SciPy

    # Use linprog to search out the optimum resolution
    c = [obj_x, obj_y]
    A = []
    b = []
    for coeff_x, coeff_y, rhs, register constraints:
    if signal == " A.append([coeff_x, coeff_y])
    b.append(rhs)
    elif signal == ">=":
    A.append([-coeff_x, -coeff_y])
    b.append(-rhs)

    consequence = linprog(c, A_ub=A, b_ub=b, technique='simplex') #technique = 'simplex': Use the simplex technique to unravel linear programming issues

    • SciPy’s linprog perform computes the optimum resolution utilizing the Simplex technique.

    9. Show the Optimum Answer and the Ultimate Plot

    if consequence.success:
    optimal_point = consequence.x
    optimal_value = consequence.enjoyable
    ask = enter('Do you need to print variety of iterations, optimum level and optimum worth? (sure/no): ')
    if ask == 'sure':
    optimization_type = enter("What kind of the target perform? (max/min): ")
    if optimization_type == 'max':
    optimal_value = -optimal_value
    else:
    optimal_value = optimal_value
    print('optimal_point:', optimal_point)
    print('optimal_value:', optimal_value)
    print('Complete variety of iterations:', consequence.nit)

    # Plot the optimum resolution
    plt.plot(optimal_point[0], optimal_point[1], 'ro', label='Optimum Answer')
    plt.annotate(f'({optimal_point[0]}, {optimal_point[1]})', (optimal_point[0], optimal_point[1]), textcoords="offset factors", xytext=(-10,-10), ha='middle')
    plt.legend(loc="decrease proper")
    else:
    print('No possible resolution')
    plt.legend(loc="decrease proper")
    # Set plot limits and labels
    plt.xlim((-20, 20))
    plt.ylim((-20, 20))
    plt.xlabel('x')
    plt.ylabel('y')
    plt.title('Possible Area and Optimum Answer')

    plt.present()

    10. Instance Enter & Output:

    We think about the identical LP drawback as earlier than:
    📌 Instance Downside

    Enter for the Goal Perform:

    Be aware: rework the issue by changing maximization into minimization: max f(x)= -min -f(x)

    Enter for Constraints:

    Ask for print variety of iterations, optimum level and optimum worth:

    Ultimate plot:

    Ultimate output exhibits:

    ✅ Possible Area
    ✅ Constraint Strains
    ✅ Optimum Answer



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleDriving the Future: Rivian’s Rise and Vision in the EV Industry
    Next Article Are friends electric? | MIT Technology Review
    FinanceStarGate

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    Creating Smart Forms with Auto-Complete and Validation using AI | by Seungchul Jeff Ha | Jun, 2025

    June 14, 2025
    Machine Learning

    What If Your Portfolio Could Speak for You? | by Lusha Wang | Jun, 2025

    June 14, 2025
    Machine Learning

    YouBot: Understanding YouTube Comments and Chatting Intelligently — An Engineer’s Perspective | by Sercan Teyhani | Jun, 2025

    June 13, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts

    Text-To-Image using Diffusion model with AWS Sagemaker Distributed Training | by Aniketp | Mar, 2025

    March 21, 2025

    Training Large Language Models: From TRPO to GRPO

    February 6, 2025

    Weight Initializations: Never It For Granteed | by Ashwathsreeram | Apr, 2025

    April 19, 2025

    🚀 Explore Generative AI with the Vertex AI Gemini API — My Google Cloud Skill Badge Journey | by Arpit Jain | Apr, 2025

    April 29, 2025

    3 Things I’ve Learned About Hiring and Firing After 35 Years in Business

    May 27, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    Most Popular

    From Code Completion to Code Collaboration: How Agentic AI Is Revolutionizing Software Development | by Mohit Kumar | Jun, 2025

    June 9, 2025

    How Confirmation Bias Is Destroying Your Product

    May 23, 2025

    گزارش رسمی نشست خبری با دکتر سید محسن حسینی خراسانی | by Saman sanat mobtaker | Apr, 2025

    April 29, 2025
    Our Picks

    Most Canadians feel tips are too high: survey

    March 13, 2025

    How to Build Partnerships That Actually Drive Growth

    April 17, 2025

    Time Series Forecasting Made Simple (Part 1): Decomposition and Baseline Models

    April 9, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2025 Financestargate.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.