Close Menu
    Trending
    • Turn Your Professional Expertise into a Book—You Don’t Even Have to Write It Yourself
    • Agents, APIs, and the Next Layer of the Internet
    • AI copyright anxiety will hold back creativity
    • ML Data Pre-processing: Cleaning and Preparing Data for Success | by Brooksolivia | Jun, 2025
    • Business Owners Can Finally Replace a Subtle Cost That Really Adds Up
    • I Won $10,000 in a Machine Learning Competition — Here’s My Complete Strategy
    • When AIs bargain, a less advanced agent could cost you
    • Do You Really Need GraphRAG? — AI Innovations and Insights 50 | by Florian June | AI Exploration Journey | Jun, 2025
    Finance StarGate
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • AI Technology
    • Data Science
    • Machine Learning
    • Finance
    • Passive Income
    Finance StarGate
    Home»Machine Learning»Is a Simple Model always Worse than a Complex Model? | by Yoshimasa | Mar, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Is a Simple Model always Worse than a Complex Model? | by Yoshimasa | Mar, 2025

    FinanceStarGateBy FinanceStarGateMarch 17, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Photograph by Joanna Kosinska on Unsplash

    Within the ever-evolving world of machine studying, there’s a standard perception: The extra advanced the mannequin, the higher the efficiency. Deep neural networks, ensemble fashions, and transformer-based architectures typically dominate discussions.

    I used to imagine that, too, so I rarely used easy fashions like linear regression for the Kaggle competitions.

    However sooner or later, I unexpectedly received higher efficiency with linear regression than with LGBM. That’s after I realized that easy fashions can have their place.

    Occam’s Razor means that amongst competing hypotheses, the only one is usually the perfect. The identical precept applies to machine studying: a mannequin needs to be so simple as doable whereas nonetheless capturing important patterns.

    Overly advanced fashions might overfit the coaching information, which means they be taught noise slightly than true underlying patterns. In distinction, easier fashions are inclined to generalize higher, making them extra sturdy in real-world purposes

    After all, advanced fashions are inclined to have higher efficiency than easier fashions, however it additionally means extra sources and computational prices wanted, the next threat for overfitting (that’s why my linear regression performs higher than LGBM in that case), and more durable to deploy.

    when we have now extra datasets and wish to seize intricate patterns, the advanced mannequin can have a lot better efficiency.
    But when a fancy mannequin improves accuracy by 0.5% however takes 100x extra sources, is it value it?

    The controversy between easy and sophisticated fashions isn’t about which is inherently higher — it’s about choosing the proper device for the job. However how?

    Listed below are a number of sensible tips:

    1. Begin Easy, Then Iterate

    All the time start with a easy mannequin as a baseline. If it performs properly, there’s no want so as to add pointless complexity. Complicated fashions ought to solely be launched if they supply vital enhancements in efficiency.

    2. Take into account the Measurement of Your Information

    In case you have a small dataset, easier fashions (like logistic regression or determination bushes) typically generalize higher. In case you have a giant dataset, advanced fashions (like deep studying) can leverage the extra information for higher outcomes.

    3. Suppose About Interpretability

    Interpretability performs a vital position in selecting between a easy and sophisticated mannequin. In fields like healthcare and finance, understanding the reasoning behind predictions is crucial attributable to regulatory and moral necessities. A less complicated mannequin that gives clear insights into its decision-making course of might be extra priceless than a barely extra correct but opaque advanced mannequin, notably when choices carry vital penalties.

    Assess Useful resource Constraints

    Evaluating your venture’s necessities is crucial when selecting between easy and sophisticated fashions. Take into account the computational sources out there — advanced fashions typically demand extra processing energy and reminiscence, which is usually a constraint if sources are restricted. Moreover, consider the time required for coaching and updates. In dynamic environments or when coping with quickly altering information, a less complicated mannequin that may be shortly retrained might supply larger flexibility and effectivity.

    There’s no single reply as to if a easy mannequin is “higher” or “worse” than a fancy one. The most effective mannequin is the one which balances efficiency, interpretability, useful resource effectivity, and generalizability.

    So ask your self: Is the added complexity actually value it? If a less complicated mannequin can do the job simply as properly, it is likely to be the smarter selection.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleDriving A 28-Year-Old Beater Made Me Love My Car Again
    Next Article Is Google playing catchup on search with OpenAI?
    FinanceStarGate

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    ML Data Pre-processing: Cleaning and Preparing Data for Success | by Brooksolivia | Jun, 2025

    June 17, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Do You Really Need GraphRAG? — AI Innovations and Insights 50 | by Florian June | AI Exploration Journey | Jun, 2025

    June 17, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Categorical Data Encoding: The Secret Sauce Behind Better Machine Learning Models | by Pradeep Jaiswal | Jun, 2025

    June 17, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts

    Why Taking a Break From Your Business Could Be the Best Thing for It

    March 2, 2025

    Imagine If Watching More TV Made You Smarter

    February 2, 2025

    How to Format Your TDS Draft: A Quick(ish) Guide

    March 28, 2025

    Struggling to Land a Data Role in 2025? These 5 Tips Will Change That

    April 29, 2025

    3 Lessons Entrepreneurs Can Learn from Frederick Douglass About Leading in Challenging Times

    February 1, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    Most Popular

    The Future of Alpha: L2 — Reimagining Quant Trading and Derivatives with Agentic AI and Machine Learning | by peter joseph | May, 2025

    May 2, 2025

    YouBot: Understanding YouTube Comments and Chatting Intelligently — An Engineer’s Perspective | by Sercan Teyhani | Jun, 2025

    June 13, 2025

    Detecting Malicious URLs Using LSTM and Google’s BERT Models

    May 28, 2025
    Our Picks

    ML Data Pre-processing: Cleaning and Preparing Data for Success | by Brooksolivia | Jun, 2025

    June 17, 2025

    How I Built a Bulletproof Portfolio (And What Most People Get Wrong)

    May 8, 2025

    Building A Neural Network from Scratch in Go | by Robert McMenemy | Feb, 2025

    February 23, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2025 Financestargate.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.