Can mental property survive as AI advances and allegedly uses copyrighted work as coaching materials?
Twitter (now X) co-founder Jack Dorsey not too long ago weighed in on the talk, taking to X on Friday to name for an finish to intellectual property law, which covers areas like copyright, patents, and emblems — and Elon Musk permitted of his stance.
“Delete all IP legislation,” Dorsey wrote on Friday night in a post that has been considered greater than 10 million occasions. An hour later, Musk responded, “I agree.”
I agree
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 11, 2025
Dorsey instantly obtained pushback from lawyer and former 2024 vice-presidential candidate Nicole Shanahan.
Shanahan, who was married to Google co-founder Sergey Brin until 2023, informed Dorsey that IP legislation was the “solely” barrier between work created by human beings and work by AI.
“IP legislation is the one factor separating human creations from AI creations,” Shanahan wrote in a reply to Dorsey’s submit. “If you wish to reform it, let’s discuss!”
Dorsey objected, replying that “creativity” is what separates people from AI and that the authorized system is at the moment inhibiting creativity.
Jack Dorsey. Photographer: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg through Getty Pictures
Whereas Dorsey might wish to finish mental property legislation, copyright holders are nonetheless holding on to their work. Dozens of cases have been filed over the previous few years in U.S. federal courtroom towards AI firms like OpenAI, Google, and Meta, as authors, artists, and news organizations accuse these firms of utilizing their copyrighted work to coach AI fashions with out credit score or compensation.
AI wants ample coaching materials to maintain it sharp. It took about 300 billion words to coach ChatGPT, an AI chatbot now utilized by over 500 million people weekly. AI picture generator DALL·E 2 needed “tons of of hundreds of thousands of captioned photographs from the web” to change into operational.
Associated: Jack Dorsey Announces His Departure from Bluesky on X, Calls Elon Musk’s Platform ‘Freedom Technology’
The primary U.S. ruling on AI copyright legislation arrived in February when a Delaware federal courtroom ruled that authorized analysis agency Ross Intelligence was not allowed to repeat content material from Thomson Reuters.
Ross Intelligence asserted it was allowed to make the most of copyrighted materials to coach its AI below the fair use doctrine, which allows the usage of a copyrighted work in particular circumstances. Nonetheless, the courtroom dismissed the truthful use protection as a result of the AI coaching information was employed in a business context.
Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman commented on truthful use in AI copyright legislation at the Aspen Ideas Festival in June. Suleyman acknowledged then that the majority net content material was truthful use for “anybody” to repeat or recreate, with the doable exception of some information websites and publishers which have requested to not be scraped.
“That is the grey space, and I feel that is going to work its manner via the courts,” Suleyman mentioned, on the time.
Associated: A Microsoft-Partnered AI Startup Is Being Sued By the Biggest Record Labels in the World
