Jamie Golombek: Latest courtroom case an essential reminder to be sure you’re comfy with something you declare in your return
Opinions and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Below our tax system in Canada, every particular person information his or her personal tax return and is taxed on the revenue they earn on a person foundation. The United States, alternatively, permits the submitting of joint tax returns during which each spouses can pool their revenue on the identical return, with larger joint-tax brackets for the couple than for a single taxpayer.
Article content material
Article content material
There are, nevertheless, a couple of locations on the Canadian tax return the place spouses or common-law companions have a chance for tax planning by selecting on which return to say sure revenue, bills or credit.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Maybe probably the most well-known alternative for spousal tax planning is the power to separate eligible pension revenue along with your partner. Pension splitting lets you save income tax the place one partner is in a decrease tax bracket upon retirement than the opposite, and may mean you can protect income-tested authorities advantages and credit, resembling your Old Age Security pension or the age credit score. To reap the advantages of pension splitting for 2024, each you and your partner should full Canada Income Company Form T1032, Joint Election to Cut up Pension Revenue and file the kinds along with your tax returns.
One other alternative for tax financial savings between spouses is relating to claiming medical bills. For the 2024 return, you possibly can declare medical bills in case your family’s whole eligible medical bills exceed the lesser of three per cent of your web revenue, or $2,759. Because of this, it’s typically advisable to pool all of the household’s medical bills collectively and declare them on the lower-income partner’s tax return.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Lastly, relating to charitable donations, it’s typically finest to pool all donations on one partner’s return, as a result of there’s a decrease federal credit score of 15 per cent for the primary $200 of annual charitable donations. (Alberta taxpayers often is the exception owing to Alberta’s excessive provincial donation credit score of 60 per cent on the primary $200.) As well as, for high-income earners (revenue over $246,752 in 2024), the federal donation credit score charge jumps to 33 per cent, which means that the high-income partner ought to typically declare donations if they’re the only partner with revenue over that threshold.
However it’s essential to do not forget that when you do select to say a donation tax credit score in your return, even when the donation was made by your partner, you’re the one who’s in the end accountable ought to the CRA ever problem the validity of your donation. Take the latest case, determined earlier this month, of a taxpayer who went to federal courtroom looking for a judicial overview of a call by the CRA denying her request for reduction of arrears curiosity accruing since 2005 on a donation tax shelter bought by her now ex-husband.
Commercial 4
Article content material
The taxpayer’s troubles started again in 2005, when she claimed a tax credit score in respect of a $41,616 donation to the Canadian Humanitarian Belief (CHT). The donation was organized by her ex, regardless that she claimed it on her personal tax return. The CHT was a donation tax shelter scheme during which 1000’s of Canadians participated. Individuals made a money donation to the CHT, which then generated an in-kind donation that the individuals claimed on their tax returns. In 2005, the taxpayer’s money donation was $11,340 whereas the in-kind donation represented the distinction between this quantity and the $41,616 claimed on her tax return.
In June 2008, the CRA reassessed the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return, and denied the donation tax credit score in full. She was consequently reassessed for a further quantity of $18,460 of tax owing, plus arrears curiosity. In December 2008, the taxpayer filed her first discover of objection. In February 2009, the CRA knowledgeable her that given the excessive variety of Canadians who had participated within the CHT tax shelter, her objection can be held in abeyance till a closing judicial determination on the validity of those donations was rendered.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Quick ahead to February 2015, when the CRA suggested the taxpayer that her 2005 tax return can be reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, and that the arrears curiosity can be adjusted accordingly. The CRA then supplied the taxpayer with two choices: she might both waive her objection or attraction rights and the CRA would cancel the curiosity for the in-kind portion of her donation, or she might pursue her objection, during which case arrears curiosity would proceed to accrue on her excellent steadiness. The letter additionally indicated that silence can be interpreted as deciding on possibility two.
The taxpayer by no means responded to the CRA’s letter, and in July 2015, the taxpayer’s 2005 tax return was reassessed to permit solely the money portion of the donation, together with her excellent tax owing lowered to $13,551, plus arrears curiosity. The taxpayer once more objected, however her objection was held in abeyance pending a closing determination in two lead take a look at circumstances regarding the validity of in-kind donations to the CHT.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Lastly, in Could 2020, the Federal Court docket of Enchantment ultimately ruled that the CHT was, in actual fact, a donation tax shelter scheme, and disallowed claims for charitable tax credit for in-kind donations. In January 2021, the Supreme Court docket of Canada denied depart to attraction, thus formally ending the authorized journey.
The CRA then resumed processing objections regarding the reassessment of CHT donations and in June 2022 the taxpayer was issued a discover of affirmation that the in-kind donation of $30,318 was disallowed as a charitable donation. The CRA did comply with waive some arrears curiosity for 2020 due to the CRA’s response to the pandemic, and from a part of 2021 by 2022, due to the CRA’s delays in processing objections after the ultimate decision of the 2 take a look at circumstances.
The taxpayer objected and went to tax courtroom. In February 2024, that courtroom dismissed her attraction, figuring out that the taxpayer “couldn’t shift accountability onto her ex-husband, as she claimed the donations on her 2005 tax returns and now she should dwell with the results.”
Commercial 7
Article content material
The taxpayer, confronted with a big tax invoice and 20 years’ price of arrears curiosity, wrote to the CRA requesting curiosity reduction. This was twice denied by the CRA, so the taxpayer went to federal courtroom looking for a judicial overview of the CRA’s determination to not waive curiosity.
Earlier this month, the federal courtroom decide dismissed the taxpayer’s case, discovering that the taxpayer “has not met her burden to show the unreasonableness of the (CRA’s) determination to disclaim her taxpayer reduction.”
Advisable from Editorial
The case serves as an essential reminder to all of us this tax season: be sure you’re comfy with something you declare in your private return.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].
In case you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you want to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.
Article content material
