Cranbury, NJ (April 3, 2025)–App Builder, a low code platform from software program firm Infragistics designed to streamlines app creation from design to code, has launched Half 1 of its two-part 2025 App Improvement Developments Report.
The inaugural report reveals the numerous function that low-code and no-code options now play in organizations, with 95% of corporations having used the instruments for software program improvement up to now yr. At the same time as corporations combine AI into extra components of their enterprise, 84% of tech leaders say that AI is not going to exchange their reliance on low-code and no-code options. As a substitute, greater than three-quarters (76%) of them say that AI will make their current instruments extra environment friendly.
App Builder’s 2025 App Development Trends Report explores how corporations are at present utilizing low- code and no-code instruments in software program improvement. The report highlights the impression of those options throughout organizations, together with driving efficiencies, decreasing prices and rising flexibility. The brand new report additionally reveals how tech leaders consider rising know-how and developments, like AI, will impression low-code and no-code improvement.
“Corporations’ use of low-code and no-code instruments have steadily elevated over the previous decade–and right this moment these options are crucial to how builders, designers, CIOs and others construct scalable functions and efficient improvement processes. Now, as AI converges with low-code and no-code, we’ll see a wholly new paradigm emerge that may change how apps are constructed, who can construct them and how briskly it may well occur,” mentioned Jason Beres, SVP of Developer Instruments, Infragistics.
The brand new, two-part report is predicated on analysis performed by market analysis agency Dynata, on behalf of App Builder.
Among the many findings:
-
Almost each tech chief is seeing money and time financial savings with low-code and no-code instruments. Ninety-eight p.c (98%) of tech leaders reported improvement time financial savings with low-code and no-code options–with practically 4 out of 5 corporations (78%) saving as much as 50% of improvement time. It’s not simply time saved, 62% of corporations that use low-code and no-code instruments have decreased software program improvement prices. Whereas greater than half (67%) of tech leaders say they’ve decreased prices as much as 30%, ten p.c of them say they’ve decreased prices by greater than half.
-
Corporations’ causes to make use of low-code/no-code instruments have advanced. Lots of the prime causes corporations carried out low-code and no-code instruments proceed to be why they use them right this moment, with bettering developer productiveness (37%) main the checklist. However different causes to make use of the instruments have grown in significance since preliminary implementation, together with permitting builders to give attention to extra strategic work (25% now vs. 22% initially), rising end-user satisfaction (20% now vs. 17% initially) and reducing guide errors (19% now vs. 15% initially).
-
Customized utility improvement is now a precedence for corporations. Generic functions don’t lower it anymore; companies have to evolve their apps to fulfill the distinctive wants of their enterprise and prospects. Almost one-third of tech leaders (29%) say their prime motive for utilizing low-code and no-code instruments is to extend flexibility to create customized apps that meet particular firm wants.
“It’s clear low-code and no-code instruments are right here to remain. As corporations incorporate AI and different new applied sciences into low-code and no-code improvement, tech leaders should not solely leverage the advantages of automating extra app improvement processes quicker, bettering collaboration and rising productiveness, however guarantee their organizations and improvement groups proceed to evolve and upskill with their know-how,” added Beres.
App Builder’s 2025 App Improvement Developments Report is predicated on responses from 300 U.S. tech leaders, employed full-time. Half 1 of the report might be seen here.
