Amazon Textract is AWS’s machine studying service that reads and processes paperwork mechanically. It does extra than simply flip photos into textual content like primary OCR instruments. You should use it to tug knowledge from types and tables, course of each typed and handwritten textual content, work with PDFs and scanned photos, and deal with multilingual document processing. It even comes with ready-to-use instruments for particular paperwork like invoices, IDs, and lending paperwork.
Our evaluation of real-world implementations revealed Textract’s clear strengths and limitations. It excels at processing structured monetary paperwork and types inside the AWS ecosystem. The pricing begins at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for primary textual content extraction, scaling up for specialised doc varieties like invoices or lending paperwork. Then again, he platform falls quick in relation to:
➡️
1. Accuracy when processing handwritten textual content
2. Prices that scale poorly for giant volumes
3. Advanced doc layouts and non-standard formatting
4. Desk extraction with superior formatting
5. Setup requiring AWS experience and ongoing upkeep
Let’s take a look at the highest Textract options that will help you choose the suitable software to your doc processing wants.
A quick comparability of Amazon Textract options
Sr No. | Product | Fundamental characteristic | G2 score | Free trial | Pricing | Complete rating* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amazon Textract | AWS-native doc processing | 4.4/5 | No | Pay-as-you-go ($1.50 per 1,000 pages) | 43.4 |
2 | Nanonets | Finish-to-end automation with 98% accuracy | 4.8/5 | Sure (500 pages) | Pay-as-you-go, First 500 pages free | 46.5 |
3 | Rossum | Cognitive knowledge seize | 4.4/5 | No | Customized pricing | 43.8 |
4 | Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | Begins at $39/month | 44.0 |
5 | Azure DI | Enterprise integration | 4.5/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
6 | Google Cloud Doc AI | ML-powered processing | 4.2/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
7 | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR capabilities | 4.1/5 | No | Begins at $4,150 (one-time) | 44.3 |
8 | Tungsten Seize | Excessive-volume doc scanning | 4.3/5 | Sure | Customized pricing | 43.0 |
9 | Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | Begins at $50/consumer/12 months | 43.9 |
10 | Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized pricing | 46.3 |
(*Seek advice from scoring methodology on the backside)
Now, let’s study every different intimately to grasp their particular strengths, limitations, and ideally suited use instances. We’ll analyze how they evaluate to Textract and enable you to decide which answer most closely fits your doc processing wants.
1. Nanonets
Nanonets is an AI based document processing platform that goes past primary OCR to supply end-to-end automation. In contrast to Textract’s template-based strategy, we use deep studying to grasp doc context and adapt to new layouts mechanically. Our platform combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to deal with every thing from knowledge extraction to workflow automation.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc classification and routing
2. Automated knowledge validation and error checking
3. Customized mannequin coaching with as few as 10 samples
4. Pre-built fashions for invoices, receipts, IDs
5. Multi-stage approval workflows
6. Database matching for knowledge verification
7. Automated export to accounting techniques
8. Webhook and API integrations
9. Constructed-in human verification instruments
Professionals of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
---|---|
Template-free processing with self-learning fashions | Increased value for low volumes |
Helps 40+ languages | UI could be overwhelming at first |
Pre-trained fashions for frequent paperwork | Studying curve for advanced workflows |
In depth integration capabilities | |
Sturdy workflow automation capabilities | |
Constructed-in verification and approval flows | |
Sturdy API documentation and assist | |
Common mannequin enhancements from corrections |
Pricing: Free tier accessible for first 500 pages. Professional plan begins at $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Finest suited to: Mid to giant organizations in finance, healthcare, logistics, and manufacturing sectors processing various doc varieties.
How does Nanonets evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Nanonets |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.1 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
9.4 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.6 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Nanonet if you happen to’re in search of self-learning fashions, in depth workflow automation, and built-in verification instruments to automate your doc processing workflow end-to-end. Nanonets might help you deal with various doc layouts and a number of languages or guarantee seamless knowledge move along with your present enterprise techniques.
2. Rossum

Rossum’s strategy to doc processing entails utilizing cognitive knowledge seize as an alternative of conventional template-based extraction. The platform combines AI-powered understanding with in depth workflow automation to deal with the complete doc lifecycle – from receiving to processing to integration with enterprise techniques.
Learn About: Rossum Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Cognitive knowledge seize with out templates
2. Multi-channel doc receiving
3. Constructed-in exception dealing with workflow
4. In depth validation guidelines engine
5. Enterprise-grade integrations
6. Customized area validation
7. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
8. Two-way communication for exceptions
Professionals of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
---|---|
No templates wanted for brand spanking new layouts | Increased value for low volumes |
Higher dealing with of advanced paperwork | System glitches throughout updates |
Sturdy enterprise-grade assist | Slower processing of enormous PDFs |
Constructed-in exception administration | Steeper studying curve initially |
In depth validation capabilities | Advanced API for tax constructions |
Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel assist |
Versatile customization choices | |
Sturdy safety compliance |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes based mostly on quantity. Contains SLA ensures and devoted assist.
Finest suited to: Organizations throughout manufacturing, retail, and monetary providers that want complete doc automation. Rossum notably excels in AP departments and shared service facilities processing various vendor paperwork.
How does Rossum evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Rossum |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
9.2 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.3 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum if it’s worthwhile to course of various doc varieties with robust validation and compliance controls. The platform notably shines in accounts payable automation and vendor doc processing the place template upkeep could be impractical.
3. Docparser

Docparser gives a rule-based strategy utilizing zonal OCR expertise. Whereas Textract makes use of machine studying to grasp paperwork, Docparser helps you to outline precisely how and the place to extract knowledge utilizing customizable parsing guidelines.
💡
Key options:
1. Customizable zonal OCR extraction
2. Superior desk parsing capabilities
3. Good doc routing system
4. Pre-built parsing templates
5. Automated knowledge formatting
6. Multi-format doc assist
7. In depth API entry
Professionals of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
---|---|
Extra exact extraction management | Requires handbook rule setup |
Higher with constant layouts | Restricted AI capabilities |
Stronger desk extraction | Studying curve for setup |
Extra reasonably priced for low volumes | One language at a time |
Less complicated integration choices | Template upkeep wanted |
Fast processing velocity | Not ideally suited for various layouts |
Glorious buyer assist | |
Clear pricing construction |
Pricing: Clear tiered pricing beginning at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork. Enterprise plans accessible.
Finest suited to: Small to mid-sized companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in finance and operations.
How does Docparser evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Docparser |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.0 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.8 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.7 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
8.5 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Docparser if you happen to want granular management over extraction guidelines and work primarily with structured paperwork. Its rule-based strategy makes it ideally suited for automated workflows the place paperwork have predictable codecs and also you want exact desk extraction. The platform gives higher worth for smaller doc volumes and offers extra simple integration choices.
4. Azure AI Doc Intelligence

Azure AI Document Intelligence is a part of Microsoft’s cloud platform, Azure, which offers over 200 cloud providers for companies. It represents Microsoft’s enterprise-focused strategy to doc processing, providing processing capabilities that run each within the cloud and by yourself servers. You may deploy it by containers that fit your particular knowledge storage and processing location necessities.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc evaluation (learn/structure)
2. Pre-built enterprise doc fashions
3. Customized neural mannequin coaching
4. Doc classification
5. Container-based deployment
6. Azure service integration
7. Constructed-in validation guidelines
8. Multi-language assist
9. Human evaluate workflows
Professionals of Azure DI | Cons of Azure DI |
---|---|
On-premises deployment possibility | Advanced preliminary configuration |
Pre-built enterprise fashions | Requires technical experience |
Sturdy Azure integration | Studying curve for superior options |
Customized neural fashions | Updates could cause disruptions |
Doc classification | Price administration complexity |
Container assist | Documentation gaps |
Enterprise safety | |
A number of deployment decisions |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on pages processed. Free tier consists of 500 pages month-to-month. Enterprise pricing accessible for top volumes.
Finest suited to: Enterprises throughout healthcare, finance, and authorities sectors that have to course of paperwork within the cloud and on their servers.
How does Azure Kind Recognizer evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Azure DI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Azure Doc Intelligence whenever you want extra management over the place your doc processing occurs. It might even be a sensible choice if you happen to already use Microsoft providers.
5. Google Cloud Doc AI

Document AI represents Google’s enterprise strategy to doc processing. A part of the corporate’s cloud division, it combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to rework unstructured paperwork into actionable knowledge. It offers an end-to-end platform for doc processing, evaluation, and storage.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc processors (OCR, splitter, parser)
2. Pre-built enterprise processors
3. Doc AI Workbench for customized fashions
4. Doc AI Warehouse for storage
5. Human-in-loop evaluate capabilities
6. Built-in processing console
7. Multi-language assist
8. Batch processing limitations
9. API-first structure
Professionals of Doc AI | Cons of Doc AI |
---|---|
In depth pre-built processors | Restricted batch processing |
Sturdy ML/AI capabilities | Advanced pricing construction |
Built-in storage answer | Requires technical experience |
Human evaluate workflows | Increased studying curve |
Google Cloud integration | Enterprise-focused pricing |
Common mannequin enhancements | Documentation gaps |
Sturdy OCR accuracy | |
Versatile deployment |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on doc processing quantity. Free tier accessible for testing. Enterprise pricing accessible for top volumes.
Finest suited to: Enterprises processing various doc varieties at scale, particularly people who require advanced evaluation. If an integration with Google Cloud is sensible to your online business.
How does Google Cloud Doc AI evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Google Cloud Doc AI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.7 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.5 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.0 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Doc AI if your online business wants highly effective ML/AI capabilities and pre-built for advanced doc processing wants. Nevertheless, do observe that its enterprise focus could also be overkill for easier use instances. It really works nicely whenever you want robust OCR capabilities mixed with doc storage and search.
6. ABBYY FlexiCapture

ABBYY FlexiCapture is a robust clever doc processing platform that automates the seize, classification, and knowledge extraction from all kinds of doc varieties and codecs. In contrast to Textract’s cloud-only mannequin, FlexiCapture gives each on-premises and cloud deployment choices, making it appropriate for organizations with strict knowledge safety and compliance necessities.
Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR for structured and unstructured paperwork
2. AI-based knowledge seize and extraction
3. Clever doc classification and separation
4. Scalable batch processing for top volumes
5. Customizable enterprise guidelines and validation
6. Multi-channel enter (scanner, e-mail, fax, cell)
7. Seamless integration with BPM, RPA, and ECM techniques
8. Versatile deployment choices (on-premises, cloud, hybrid)
9. Multi-language assist
Professionals of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
---|---|
Extremely correct knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles numerous doc codecs | Steep studying curve |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Increased upfront funding |
Sturdy integration capabilities | Requires specialised IT abilities to keep up |
Versatile deployment choices | |
Sturdy compliance and security measures |
Pricing: Based mostly on the variety of pages processed yearly, with the price per web page reducing as quantity will increase. On-premises and cloud-based pricing fashions can be found, with on-premises requiring a better upfront funding however decrease ongoing prices. Precise pricing isn’t publicly disclosed.
Finest suited to: Enterprises and organizations with high-volume doc processing wants and strict compliance necessities, like healthcare, finance, and authorities.
How does ABBYY FlexiCapture evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
ABBYY FlexiCapture |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
10.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select FlexiCapture if you happen to want enterprise-grade doc processing with robust batch capabilities and versatile deployment choices. The platform notably shines when processing excessive volumes of advanced paperwork with strict compliance necessities.
7. Tungsten Seize (previously Kofax Seize)

Tungsten Capture is a doc scanning and knowledge extraction answer that automates the conversion of paper paperwork into digital knowledge. It focuses on high-volume doc scanning, OCR, and knowledge seize.
Learn About: Kofax Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior doc scanning and picture processing
2. Clever doc separation and classification
3. Automated knowledge extraction utilizing OCR and ICR
4. VRS (VirtualReScan) expertise for picture enhancement
5. Integration with different Tungsten Modules for superior knowledge extraction
6. Assist for a variety of scanners and multi-function gadgets
7. Scalable structure for high-volume processing
8. Batch processing and workflow automation capabilities
9. Centralized administration and monitoring
Professionals of Tungsten Seize | Cons of Tungsten Seize |
---|---|
Extremely correct OCR and knowledge extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles numerous doc varieties and codecs | Steep studying curve |
Highly effective picture enhancement with VRS | Increased upfront prices |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Requires on-premises infrastructure |
In depth customization choices | Restricted out-of-the-box integrations |
Mature and confirmed expertise | Older consumer interface design |
Pricing: Pricing relies on the variety of pages scanned yearly, with quantity reductions accessible. Extra prices might apply for add-on modules, skilled providers, and upkeep. Precise pricing isn’t publicly disclosed, but it surely usually entails a major upfront funding and ongoing upkeep charges.
Finest suited to: Organizations with high-volume, centralized doc scanning necessities, comparable to shared service facilities, BPOs, and enormous enterprises with devoted scanning departments.
How does Tungsten Seize evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Tungsten Seize |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.7 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Tungsten Seize if you happen to want a sturdy, on-premises answer for high-volume doc scanning and knowledge extraction. Its superior picture processing, batch scanning capabilities, and in depth customization choices make it appropriate for advanced doc seize wants and present infrastructure.
8. Laserfiche

Laserfiche is a complete enterprise content material administration (ECM) and enterprise course of automation platform that features sturdy doc seize and processing capabilities. It gives an end-to-end answer that mixes clever doc seize, safe storage, workflow automation, and information administration.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc seize and classification
2. Workflow designer for course of automation
3. Digital types and digital signatures
4. Doc administration and model management
5. Information administration and retention insurance policies
6. Safe doc storage and entry management
7. Cellular doc seize and entry
8. Varied integration choices and APIs
Professionals | Cons |
---|---|
Complete content material administration | Increased upfront prices |
Highly effective workflow automation | Steeper studying curve |
Sturdy safety and compliance | Requires IT assets to implement and preserve |
Extremely customizable and extensible | Could require skilled providers for advanced implementations |
Scalable for enterprise deployments | |
Deep integration with enterprise techniques |
Pricing: Presents each on-premises and cloud-based deployment choices, with pricing based mostly on the variety of customers and particular modules required. You will get a free trial for its cloud-based answer.
Finest suited to: Organizations throughout industries, notably these with advanced doc administration and compliance necessities, comparable to authorities businesses, instructional establishments, monetary providers corporations, and healthcare suppliers.
How does Laserfiche evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Laserfiche |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Laserfiche if you happen to want a complete answer that mixes doc processing with doc administration, workflow automation, and information administration. It is notably precious whenever you want robust safety, compliance, and auditing capabilities alongside doc seize.
9. Hyperscience

Hyperscience is an clever doc processing platform that mixes AI, ML, and human-in-the-loop workflows to automate knowledge extraction, classification, and validation. It gives an end-to-end answer that handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork with excessive accuracy and automation charges.
Learn About: Hyperscience Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered knowledge extraction and classification
2. Assist for structured, semi-structured, and unstructured paperwork
3. ICR for handwritten textual content and low-quality photos
4. Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with and validation
5. Customizable workflows and integration with present techniques
6. Steady studying and mannequin enchancment
7. Safe and compliant infrastructure
Professionals of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
---|---|
Excessive accuracy and automation charges | Increased value in comparison with standalone options |
Handles advanced, variable, and low-quality paperwork | Longer preliminary setup and configuration |
Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with | Could require vital coaching knowledge for customized fashions |
Integration with enterprise techniques | |
Steady studying and enchancment | |
Devoted buyer success group and assist |
Pricing: Presents customized pricing.
Finest suited to: Enterprises with advanced, high-volume doc processing wants, notably these coping with variable, unstructured, or low-quality paperwork. Industries comparable to monetary providers, insurance coverage, healthcare, and authorities could possibly automate claims processing, account opening, and bill processing, with excessive accuracy and effectivity.
How does Hyperscience evaluate to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Hyperscience |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Assist |
9.1 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Path (% optimistic) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Hyperscience when it’s worthwhile to automate advanced, high-stakes processes or in case your use-case entails processing all kinds of doc varieties. It might embrace handwritten types, low-quality scans, or unstructured knowledge.
How to decide on the very best Amazon Textract different?
At Nanonets, we course of hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. This provides us distinctive insights into what works (and what would not) in doc processing. We have seen firsthand how companies wrestle to seek out the suitable doc processing answer, particularly when evaluating Amazon Textract options.
For the aim of this comparability, we evaluated Textract options based mostly on:
- Actual efficiency knowledge from processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork
- Direct suggestions from enterprise purchasers who switched platforms
- Unbiased consumer evaluations from G2, Capterra, Gartner, and TrustRadius
- Palms-on testing by our doc processing specialists
Scoring methodology*
We have evaluated every different throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Textract:
- Ease of use: How rapidly groups can begin utilizing the software with out in depth AWS experience
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort, particularly in comparison with Textract’s AWS-centric setup
- High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of assist, a standard ache level with Textract
- Meets necessities: Skill to deal with doc processing wants past Textract’s capabilities
- Product path: Steady enchancment and have growth tempo
Product | Ease of Use | Ease of Setup | High quality of Assist | Meets Necessities | Product Path | Complete Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Textract | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 43.4 |
Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 46.5 |
Rossum | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
Docparser | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 8.5 | 44.0 |
Azure DI | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
Google Cloud Doc AI | 8.7 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
Tungsten Seize | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 43.0 |
Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
Key choice components
Based mostly on frequent challenges organizations face with Textract, think about these features:
Doc complexity necessities
- Do you want higher handwriting recognition than Textract gives?
- Are you processing advanced tables or types?
- Do it’s worthwhile to deal with a number of languages successfully?
AWS dependency concerns
- How tightly built-in are you with AWS providers?
- Would a cloud-agnostic answer provide extra flexibility?
- Do you want on-premises deployment choices?
Price construction preferences
- Is Textract’s per-page pricing mannequin working to your quantity?
- Do you want extra predictable pricing?
- What’s your month-to-month doc processing quantity?
Integration wants
- Past AWS providers, what techniques want to attach?
- Do you want pre-built connectors to frequent enterprise instruments?
- How essential is API flexibility?
Automation necessities
- Do you want workflow automation capabilities?
- Is batch processing essential to your use case?
- Do you require human-in-the-loop options?
💡
– Function units and capabilities might have modified
– Pricing fashions may differ from what’s listed
– Efficiency metrics might fluctuate based mostly in your particular use case
– Integration choices might have expanded
– New options might have been added
We suggest reaching out to distributors instantly for essentially the most present info and testing any answer completely along with your precise paperwork earlier than making a choice.
Whereas industrial options provide complete options and assist, organizations with technical assets or monetary constrainst may additionally think about open-source options for doc processing.
Tesseract OCR, maintained by Google, is likely one of the most established open-source OCR engines accessible. Another choice is EasyOCR, which gives a Python library for OCR with assist for handwriting recognition and a number of languages.
Nevertheless, in contrast to the industrial options mentioned above, open-source options usually require vital technical experience to implement and preserve and infrequently want extra growth work to match options like kind area extraction, desk evaluation, and workflow automation that come normal with industrial platforms.
FAQs
What’s the distinction between ABBYY and Textract?
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a complete doc processing platform that features superior OCR, workflow automation, and enterprise integration capabilities. It gives each cloud and on-premises deployment choices. Amazon Textract, as compared, is a cloud-only service centered particularly on knowledge extraction and doc evaluation, built-in with AWS providers.
What’s the distinction between OCR and Textract?
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is a expertise that converts photos of textual content into machine-readable textual content. Amazon Textract goes past primary OCR through the use of machine studying to not solely acknowledge textual content but in addition perceive doc construction, extract kind fields, and analyze tables mechanically. Whereas OCR merely converts textual content, Textract offers structured knowledge output and understanding of doc relationships.
Amazon Textract is a machine studying service that mechanically extracts textual content, handwriting, and knowledge from scanned paperwork. It is a part of AWS’s AI providers, designed to course of paperwork at scale with out handbook intervention. The service can determine and extract knowledge from types and tables whereas sustaining the unique doc’s construction and relationships.
Can Textract extract photos?
Textract processes photos to extract textual content and knowledge from them, but it surely would not extract photos themselves. It will possibly analyze photos containing paperwork, types, tables, and handwritten textual content, however its goal is to extract textual info and knowledge somewhat than picture content material.