Close Menu
    Trending
    • Inspiring Quotes From Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys
    • AI Is Not a Black Box (Relatively Speaking)
    • From Accidents to Actuarial Accuracy: The Role of Assumption Validation in Insurance Claim Amount Prediction Using Linear Regression | by Ved Prakash | Jun, 2025
    • I Wish Every Entrepreneur Had a Dad Like Mine — Here’s Why
    • Why You’re Still Coding AI Manually: Build a GPT-Backed API with Spring Boot in 30 Minutes | by CodeWithUs | Jun, 2025
    • New York Requiring Companies to Reveal If AI Caused Layoffs
    • Powering next-gen services with AI in regulated industries 
    • From Grit to GitHub: My Journey Into Data Science and Analytics | by JashwanthDasari | Jun, 2025
    Finance StarGate
    • Home
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • AI Technology
    • Data Science
    • Machine Learning
    • Finance
    • Passive Income
    Finance StarGate
    Home»AI Technology»Top 9 Tungsten Automation (Kofax) alternatives
    AI Technology

    Top 9 Tungsten Automation (Kofax) alternatives

    FinanceStarGateBy FinanceStarGateFebruary 2, 2025No Comments16 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email




    High 9 Tungsten Automation (Kofax) alternate options

    Tungsten Automation (previously Kofax) is a pacesetter in enterprise software program, providing options starting from course of automation to analytics. Their doc processing instruments have been notably fashionable, serving to organizations seize and course of enterprise paperwork for many years. 

    It does the basics very effectively: changing paperwork from varied sources, dealing with excessive volumes, and sending data to your enterprise programs like SAP. That is why many firms, most likely together with you, have relied on it for years.

    However here is the factor: doc processing has come a good distance. You possibly can’t depend on merchandise that pressure you to:

    💡

    1. Rent outdoors consultants for ongoing assist
    2. Months to study the platform and rise up to hurry
    3. Pay for costly setup, upkeep, and assist
    4. Have lengthy wait occasions and get restricted assist

    This text examines among the greatest Tungsten (Kofax) alternate options particularly for doc processing, serving to you consider choices that match at present’s enterprise wants.


    A fast have a look at Tungsten Automation alternate options

    Here is how the highest opponents examine:

    Device Most important Characteristic G2 Score Free Trial Pricing Complete Rating*
    Tungsten (previously Kofax) Template-based processing 4.3/5 No Customized 43.0
    Nanonets AI-powered automation 4.8/5 Sure From $999 46.5
    ABBYY FlexiCapture Superior OCR 4.1/5 No Customized 44.3
    Rossum Cognitive knowledge seize 4.4/5 Sure Customized 43.8
    Docparser Rule-based extraction 4.6/5 Sure From $39 44.0
    Hyperscience Human-in-loop workflows 4.6/5 No Customized 46.3
    Klippa DocHorizon No-code automation 4.7/5 Sure Customized NA
    DocuWare Full doc administration 4.4/5 Sure From $50/consumer 43.9
    Laserfiche Enterprise content material administration 4.7/5 Sure From $50/consumer 43.9
    OpenText SAP integration centered 4.2/5 No Customized 43.2

    *Complete Rating calculated because the sum of G2 scores for: Ease of Use, Ease of Setup, High quality of Assist, Meets Necessities, and Product Course (% optimistic). All scores are primarily based on verified G2 scores as of November 2024.

    Let us take a look at every various intimately that will help you discover the very best match to your wants.


    1. Nanonets

    Sure, we put ourselves on this checklist. However hear us out — Nanonets is an AI doc processing platform that helps firms extract and course of knowledge from any doc sort mechanically. Whereas Tungsten depends on templates and technical setups, Nanonets makes use of AI to know and course of paperwork instantly.

    💡

    Key options:
    1. AI that learns out of your paperwork
    2. No templates wanted – works with any structure
    3. Automated desk detection and extraction
    4. Constructed-in accuracy checks
    5. Direct connection to accounting programs
    6. Straightforward approval workflows
    7. Works with 40+ languages
    8. Actual-time processing
    9. Easy API entry

    Execs of Nanonets Cons of Nanonets
    Begin processing with out IT assist Unaffordable for very low volumes
    Learns and improves by itself Organising complicated workflows might take time
    Works with any doc structure
    Direct SAP and accounting connections
    Hook up with different software program with out coding
    Quick, useful assist workforce

    Pricing: Begin free with 500 pages monthly. Enterprise plans from $999/month for 10,000 pages.

    Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant firms processing excessive quantity of paperwork month-to-month, particularly in finance, healthcare, and logistics. Works notably effectively for groups that must automate AP workflows, course of diversified vendor paperwork, or deal with paperwork in a number of languages.

    How does Nanonets examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter Nanonets Tungsten
    Ease of use 9.3/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 9.2/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 9.4/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 9.1/10 8.9/10
    Product route 9.4/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Choose Nanonets if you wish to course of paperwork with out the headache of making and sustaining templates. Our platform works notably effectively if it’s good to course of various kinds of paperwork, join instantly along with your accounting system, get correct outcomes with out fixed changes, and arrange shortly with out technical assist.


    2. ABBYY FlexiCapture

    ABBYY FlexiCapture

    ABBYY FlexiCapture is a doc processing platform centered on accuracy and compliance. It helps mid-sized and enormous firms course of complicated paperwork with excessive precision, providing each cloud and on-premises choices. Whereas the arrange might be arduous like Tungsten Automation, it provides greater for accuracy.

    Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternatives and Competitors

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Superior OCR with excessive precision knowledge seize
    2. Versatile deployment – cloud or on-premises
    3. Constructed-in compliance and validation guidelines
    4. Excessive-volume batch processing capabilities
    5. Multi-channel doc enter (e mail, scan, fax)
    6. Enterprise system integration instruments

    Execs of FlexiCapture Cons of FlexiCapture
    Extremely correct knowledge extraction Takes longer to arrange than Tungsten
    Robust compliance and audit options Requires technical experience
    Alternative of cloud or on-premises Increased upfront funding
    Higher product growth roadmap Not appropriate for small companies
    Glorious for complicated paperwork Steeper studying curve

    Pricing: Customized pricing primarily based on deployment sort and doc quantity. Count on greater upfront prices for on-premises deployment.

    Finest suited to: Mid-sized firms (particularly in software program, accounting, and consulting) that want exact doc processing with robust compliance controls. Notably precious for organizations dealing with complicated paperwork or requiring particular deployment choices.

    How does ABBYY examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter ABBYY Tungsten
    Ease of use 8.7/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 8.0/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 8.8/10 7.7/10
    Assembly wants 8.0/10 8.9/10
    Future route 10.0/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Select ABBYY FlexiCapture if accuracy and compliance are your high priorities, and you’ve got the technical assets for implementation. Go together with Tungsten if you happen to want one thing easier to make use of or do not require superior compliance options.


    3. Rossum

    Rossum
    Rossum | Source

    Rossum is an clever doc processing platform that makes use of AI to extract knowledge from enterprise paperwork. The platform processes paperwork from a number of channels (e mail, scan, API), mechanically validates the extracted knowledge, and integrates with enterprise programs. It’s used primarily for bill processing and monetary doc automation.

    💡

    Key options:
    1. AI-powered doc understanding
    2. Constructed-in validation guidelines engine
    3. Multi-channel doc receiving
    4. Two-way communication for points
    5. Enterprise system integrations
    6. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed

    Execs of Rossum Cons of Rossum
    No templates wanted for brand spanking new paperwork System updates may cause disruptions
    Robust enterprise-grade assist Slower with giant PDF recordsdata
    Constructed-in exception dealing with Increased value than primary options
    Good at complicated paperwork Preliminary studying curve for groups
    Common AI enhancements Restricted Excel file assist

    Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes primarily based on quantity. Consists of SLA ensures and devoted assist.

    Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant organizations in accounting, monetary companies, and manufacturing that course of diversified vendor paperwork. Works particularly effectively for AP departments and shared service facilities dealing with various doc sorts.

    How does Rossum examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter Rossum Tungsten
    Ease of use 8.6/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 8.1/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 9.2/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 8.3/10 8.9/10
    Product route 9.8/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Select Rossum if you happen to course of a number of completely different doc sorts and wish to keep away from template upkeep. Choose Tungsten if you happen to primarily deal with standardized paperwork and like a extra typical interface.


    4. Docparser

    Docparser is a doc extraction device that makes use of zonal OCR know-how to tug knowledge from particular areas in your paperwork. Not like Tungsten’s enterprise method, Docparser provides an easier, extra reasonably priced answer centered on particular knowledge extraction wants. The platform makes a speciality of processing structured paperwork like invoices, buy orders, and financial institution statements,

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Zonal OCR for exact knowledge seize
    2. Customized parsing rule creation
    3. A number of doc format assist
    4. Direct integration with enterprise instruments
    5. Automated doc routing
    6. Desk knowledge extraction
    7. Multi-channel doc consumption (e mail, API, add)

    Execs of Docparser Cons of Docparser
    Reasonably priced beginning value Studying curve for complicated guidelines
    Fast setup for primary wants Restricted assist for various layouts
    Robust desk extraction Wants good doc high quality
    Straightforward integration choices Not ultimate for unstructured docs
    Clear pricing construction Restricted language assist

    Pricing: Begins at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork.

    Finest suited to: Small companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in retail and accounting. Excellent for firms dealing with 1,000-3,500 paperwork month-to-month that must automate guide knowledge entry from structured paperwork like buy orders and invoices.

    How does Docparser examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter Docparser Tungsten
    Ease of use 9.2/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 8.5/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 9.1/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 9.1/10 8.9/10
    Product route 8.6/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: If you happen to want reasonably priced, simple knowledge extraction for constant doc codecs, then Docparser is an efficient selection. Tungsten might go well with you higher if you happen to want enterprise-grade options or course of diversified doc sorts.


    5. Hyperscience

    Hyperscience

    Hyperscience is an AI-powered doc processing platform that makes a speciality of dealing with each structured and unstructured paperwork. The platform stands out for its capability to course of handwritten textual content and sophisticated paperwork with a high-level of accuracy. Companies and banks, use it to course of paperwork like types, contracts, and claims.

    Learn About: Hyperscience Alternatives and Competitors

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Superior handwriting recognition
    2. Human-in-loop verification
    3. Structured and unstructured doc assist
    4. Multi-language processing
    5. Customized processing blocks
    6. Automated high quality management
    7. Enterprise system integration

    Execs of Hyperscience Cons of Hyperscience
    Will get handwritten textual content proper most occasions Takes time to arrange correctly
    Catches errors mechanically Wants a number of examples for coaching
    Works with many doc sorts Advanced paperwork want extra checking
    Retains enhancing as you utilize it Prices greater than primary options
    Good technical assist Not for small doc volumes

    Pricing: Customized enterprise pricing primarily based on quantity and use case. Contact Hyperscience for particulars.

    Finest suited to: Mid to giant enterprises in monetary companies, insurance coverage, and healthcare that must course of diversified doc sorts, particularly these with handwritten elements.

    How does Hyperscience examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter Hyperscience Tungsten
    Ease of use 9.3/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 9.0/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 9.1/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 9.1/10 8.9/10
    Product route 9.8/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: In case your groups course of 1000’s of handwritten types or complicated paperwork month-to-month, and accuracy issues greater than preliminary value, you may discover worth in Hyperscience. Stick with Tungsten if you happen to primarily deal with normal paperwork or want an easier, extra reasonably priced answer.


    6. Klippa DocHorizon

    Klippa DocHorizon | Source
    Klippa DocHorizon | Source

    Klippa DocHorizon  is a no-code doc processing platform that mixes AI with conventional OCR. The platform stands out for its fast setup and API-first method, making it notably interesting if you wish to begin processing paperwork with out in depth technical work.

    Learn About: Best Klippa Alternatives and Competitors

    💡

    Key options:
    1. No-code doc processing
    2. Sensible fraud detection that spots altered paperwork
    3. Visible workflow designer for automation
    4. Multi-channel doc consumption
    5. Checks knowledge accuracy in real-time
    6. Two-way system integration
    7. Human verification possibility

    Execs of Klippa Cons of Klippa
    Get began in hours, not weeks Could not meet each customized want
    Builders love the clear API Takes time to study your paperwork
    Assist workforce jumps on issues Advanced paperwork want extra work
    Nails the fundamentals instantly Not low cost for small volumes
    Platform retains getting higher

    Pricing: Customized pricing primarily based on quantity and options wanted. Contact Klippa for particulars.

    Finest suited to: Small to mid-sized firms in finance, accounting, and retail that want fast implementation of doc processing. Works effectively for organizations eager to automate normal doc workflows with out heavy technical funding.

    How does Klippa examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Not sufficient knowledge to do a direcct comparability. Based mostly on obtainable consumer evaluations, Klippa stands out for quicker setup and easier integration. Nonetheless, it is customization choices could also be restricted in comparison with Tungsten.

    ➡️

    Our take: Choose Klippa when it’s good to hit the bottom working with doc automation. Their no-code method means you may see ends in days, not months. However look elsewhere if you happen to want deep customization or deal with a number of uncommon doc sorts — that is the place Tungsten nonetheless shines.


    7. DocuWare

    Docuware
    Docuware | Source

    DocuWare is an enterprise doc administration platform that mixes doc processing with workflow automation. It helps organizations digitize, automate, and handle document-intensive processes. The platform provides each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Sensible doc seize and indexing
    2. Customized digital types builder
    3. Visible workflow designer
    4. Multi-language assist (24 languages)
    5. Constructed-in compliance instruments
    6. Cell doc entry
    7. Enterprise system connections

    Execs of DocuWare Cons of DocuWare
    Discover paperwork shortly throughout areas Wants consultants for setup
    Automates complete doc workflows Advanced permission administration
    Robust safety for regulated industries Takes time to study superior options
    Works in lots of languages Restricted offline entry
    Retains enhancing with common updates Some primary options value additional

    Pricing: Contact DocuWare for customized pricing. Free trial obtainable to check the system.

    Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant organizations dealing with a number of paperwork throughout a number of areas. Works notably effectively for firms in regulated industries like prescription drugs and insurance coverage that want robust compliance options.

    How does DocuWare examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter DocuWare Tungsten
    Ease of use 8.8/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 7.7/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 8.9/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 9.0/10 8.9/10
    Product route 9.4/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Choose DocuWare while you want extra than simply doc seize — it shines at automating complete doc workflows throughout departments. However if you need one thing easier centered simply on processing paperwork, Tungsten is perhaps a greater match.


    8. Laserfiche

    Laserfiche

    Laserfiche is an enterprise content material administration platform that features doc processing capabilities. It combines doc seize with data administration and workflow automation. The platform helps a number of languages and provides each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Doc seize and classification
    2. Constructed-in workflow automation
    3. Digital types creation
    4. Data administration system
    5. Safety and audit controls
    6. Cell doc entry
    7. Big selection of integrations obtainable
    8. Division-specific workflows

    Execs of Laserfiche Cons of Laserfiche
    Fast doc search throughout areas Advanced to arrange correctly
    Robust safety for regulated industries Wants technical experience
    Good at automating workflows Steep studying curve
    Works in a number of languages Restricted offline entry
    Common platform updates Some options value additional

    Pricing: Begins at $50/consumer/yr for cloud starter bundle. Contact Laserfiche for enterprise pricing.

    Finest suited to: Mid-sized organizations, particularly in authorities and training that want each doc processing and data administration. Works notably effectively for organizations with strict compliance necessities.

    How does Laserfiche examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter Laserfiche Tungsten
    Ease of use 8.8/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 8.1/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 8.9/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 9.1/10 8.9/10
    Product route 9.5/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Take into account Laserfiche while you want extra than simply doc processing. If you happen to worth the power to deal with complicated doc workflows whereas assembly compliance necessities, then it is perhaps a good selection. However if you happen to simply want simple doc seize, Tungsten provides an easier path.


    9. OpenText Clever Seize

    Supply

    OpenText Intelligent Capture (previously Captiva) combines machine studying with conventional OCR to automate doc processing. The platform shines at processing structured paperwork like invoices, notably when related to SAP and different backend programs.

    💡

    Key options:
    1. Sensible doc classification
    2. Superior knowledge extraction
    3. Automated content material routing
    4. Machine studying capabilities
    5. Constructed-in validation instruments
    6. Hyperlinks instantly with SAP programs
    7. Course of automation choices

    Execs of OpenText Cons of OpenText
    Good at structured paperwork Home windows-only shopper
    Reduces guide knowledge entry Advanced to deploy
    Robust validation instruments Restricted documentation
    Useful assist workforce Efficiency points with quantity
    Common updates Wants technical experience

    Pricing: Contact OpenText for customized pricing primarily based in your wants.

    Finest suited to: Small firms processing a number of structured paperwork like invoices and types, particularly these utilizing SAP.

    How does OpenText examine to Tungsten Automation?

    Parameter OpenText Tungsten
    Ease of use 8.2/10 9.0/10
    Setup expertise 8.3/10 8.3/10
    Assist high quality 7.8/10 7.7/10
    Meets wants 8.5/10 8.9/10
    Product route 7.6/10 7.5/10

    ➡️

    Our take: Take into account OpenText while you want robust knowledge extraction for structured paperwork and have technical assets for implementation. Nonetheless, Tungsten is perhaps higher if you need one thing simpler to make use of or must course of diversified doc sorts.


    How to decide on the very best Tungsten Automation various?

    At Nanonets, we course of thousands and thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. We have helped tons of of organizations transition from legacy doc seize programs to fashionable automation options. This evaluation attracts from our expertise implementing doc processing options throughout industries and processing thousands and thousands of paperwork month-to-month.

    We have analyzed the highest alternate options primarily based on:

    • Actual efficiency knowledge from processing thousands and thousands of paperwork
    • Suggestions from firms that switched from Tungsten
    • Impartial evaluations from G2, Capterra, and Gartner
    • Fingers-on testing by doc processing consultants

    Scoring methodology*

    We evaluated every various throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Tungsten:

    1. Ease of use: How shortly groups can begin utilizing the device with out in depth technical coaching
    2. Ease of setup: Implementation effort in comparison with Tungsten’s template-based method
    3. High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of direct assist
    4. Meets necessities: Means to deal with doc processing wants successfully
    5. Product route: Tempo of enhancements and have growth

    Detailed scoring breakdown

    Device Ease of Use Setup Assist Meets Wants Course Complete
    Tungsten (previously Kofax) 9.0 8.3 7.7 8.9 7.5 43.0
    Nanonets 9.3 9.2 9.4 9.1 9.4 46.5
    ABBYY FlexiCapture 8.8 8.0 8.5 9.0 10.0 44.3
    Rossum 8.6 8.1 9.2 8.3 9.8 43.8
    Docparser 9.2 8.5 9.1 8.7 8.6 44.0
    Hyperscience 9.3 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.8 46.3
    Klippa DocHorizon NA NA NA NA NA NA
    DocuWare 8.8 8.1 8.9 9.0 9.2 43.9
    Laserfiche 8.8 8.1 8.9 9.0 9.2 43.9
    OpenText 8.2 8.3 7.8 8.5 7.6 43.2

    Key resolution components

    Based mostly on widespread challenges organizations face with Tungsten Automation, take into account these elements:

    Doc processing wants

    First, consider your doc necessities:

    • Are you primarily processing normal invoices and types?
    • Do it’s good to deal with handwritten textual content?
    • How essential is desk extraction accuracy?
    • Do you course of paperwork in a number of languages?

    Technical assets

    Take into account your implementation capabilities:

    • Do you may have IT groups for setup and upkeep?
    • What programs want integration with doc processing?
    • Do you favor cloud or on-premises deployment?
    • How essential is API accessibility?

    Quantity and scale

    Take into consideration your processing necessities:

    • What number of paperwork do you course of month-to-month?
    • Do you want batch processing capabilities?
    • Are your volumes regular or seasonal?
    • How shortly do it’s good to scale?

    Assist and upkeep

    Consider your assist wants:

    • How a lot vendor assist will you want?
    • Are you able to deal with template upkeep?
    • What degree of automation do you require?
    • How essential is native assist?t

    *Disclaimer: This evaluation makes use of knowledge from impartial consumer evaluations, technical documentation, and implementation case research obtainable as of November 2024. Since doc processing applied sciences evolve quickly:

    • Characteristic units and capabilities might have modified
    • Pricing fashions may differ from what’s listed
    • Efficiency metrics might differ primarily based in your particular use case
    • Integration choices might have expanded
    • New options might have been added

    We advocate reaching out to distributors instantly for essentially the most present data and testing any answer completely along with your precise paperwork earlier than making a call.




    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBoost Your LLM’s Intelligence: 7 Must-Have Synthetic Reasoning Datasets | by Oliver Matthews | Feb, 2025
    Next Article 5 Essential Tips Learned from My Data Science Journey | by Federico Rucci | Feb, 2025
    FinanceStarGate

    Related Posts

    AI Technology

    Powering next-gen services with AI in regulated industries 

    June 13, 2025
    AI Technology

    The problem with AI agents

    June 12, 2025
    AI Technology

    Inside Amsterdam’s high-stakes experiment to create fair welfare AI

    June 11, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts

    Investors Pay Attention to This Before Even Looking at Your Business

    February 25, 2025

    Amazon CEO: Sellers Will Pass On Tariff Costs to Shoppers

    April 10, 2025

    She Went From Temp Job to Her Own $5 Million Moving Business

    May 19, 2025

    Creating an End-to-End Deep Learning Project with FastAI | by ServerWala InfraNet FZ-LLC | Feb, 2025

    February 3, 2025

    Toward video generative models of the molecular world | MIT News

    February 6, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    Most Popular

    Here’s What It Takes to Make the Leap From Founder to CEO

    April 19, 2025

    Buying a Home? Here’s How Much Money You Need to Earn

    May 2, 2025

    One $28, Under-Appreciated Microsoft App Could Save You Thousands of Dollars

    March 15, 2025
    Our Picks

    The LLM Control Trilogy: From Tuning to Architecture, an Insider’s Look at Taming AI | by Jessweb3 | Jessweb3 Notes | Jun, 2025

    June 6, 2025

    How Young Workers Are Creating a New Opportunity for Unions

    May 23, 2025

    Starbucks Adding New Staff, Says Machines Alone Won’t Cut It

    May 1, 2025
    Categories
    • AI Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Data Science
    • Finance
    • Machine Learning
    • Passive Income
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2025 Financestargate.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.